BMW K1600 Forum banner

1 - 20 of 40 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,024 Posts
Discussion Starter #1 (Edited)

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
17,037 Posts
Middling performing detector that is certainly weather friendly.

Depends on your demands for performance.

I've been using detectors since the 1970s Fuzz Busters, so am pretty picky on how they perform. As such, I'm willing to deal with weather issues in exchange for top tier performance.

The instant on Ka used by CHP demands the ultimate in performance to sniff out when the vehicle ahead of you is illuminated by radar. Your only means of advance warning.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,785 Posts
This detector has been around for at least a few years. Moshe Levy is just now reviewing it. It is old technology when compared to the Escort Max, Max 2 etc. there had been comparisons with all the major brands and units when the unit first came out. If faired poorly in all the performance categories.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,024 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
This detector has been around for at least a few years. Moshe Levy is just now reviewing it. It is old technology when compared to the Escort Max, Max 2 etc. there had been comparisons with all the major brands and units when the unit first came out. If faired poorly in all the performance categories.
Humm.. I guess that's why they came out with a new one. If anyone has the old one they will upgrade it. Don't know how much it would cost tho.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
17,037 Posts
2.0 has been out for a couple years.

This update has BT and some additional filtering.

The issue remains with the receiving horn. If I'm wrong, it will show up on one of the comparison sites as performing in the same league as the V1, Redline and Max.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
17,037 Posts
Good bottom line quote: "During this test the TPX was found to have 4 times the capture distance of police K and Ka radar guns which placed it into the 3-star radar detector category having comparable performance to that of the Escort 8500×50."
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,857 Posts
I installed the 2.0 unit on my '12 1600GT in 2012 and used it for four years with a H.A.R.D. installed in my helmet. Work as good as any other radar detector I've ever ridden with in a group ride. I'm usually leading the ride my my group so maybe that gives me a bit of advantage but it's always going off as soon as or before the other "top quality" brands used by my friends. The weather proof aspect of it combined with the ability to react to switched power makes it easy to tuck away in a covert location and never think about it again - it's always on and alerting me when it should be.

The 2.0 unit has the transmitter in it for the H.A.R.D. so another added benefit is that you only have to buy the receiver from Legal Speeding to be up and running with a helmet mounted LED warning display.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,201 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,785 Posts
Good bottom line quote: "During this test the TPX was found to have 4 times the capture distance of police K and Ka radar guns which placed it into the 3-star radar detector category having comparable performance to that of the Escort 8500×50."
The same tester, Radar Roy, found the Escort Max and Max 2 both to have 8 times the capture distances of police K and Ka radar guns. So which is true; Radar Roy's test results or the anaecdotal reports of Adaptive units sounding off as early or earlier than other detectors? Or is there some reasonable explanation that makes both true?
My own personal experience on group rides is that I pick up radar on my Max much sooner than most of riding buddies, some of whom have the Adaptive unit. I like the Max because it pairs with the Escort live app on my iPhone to give me aural warnings such as "Live Ka alert" or "x band alert", not flashing lights or beeps, while also giving me aural warnings of known recent speed traps, red light cameras, speed cameras, police with instant on radar/laser up ahead and traffic conditions similar to Waze. With my phone mounted on my bars, I can also see where the radar or red light etc. is on the map once I am warned and the strength of the radar. I also can see the traffic along my route like Waze
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
4,857 Posts
I think a lot of the specsmanship in RD product companies are mostly distinctions without real meaning. They're hoping you buy in to the "more is better" marketing when good enough is good enough. Laser detection is an example of that. It's completely useless on any vehicle unless you've got it installed exactly where the LEO hits you with the laser spot. There's no scatter to pick up otherwise. And when you're hit, you're done with no time to react. The only reason they put anything like that in the RD units is specsmanship.

But hey, we're motorcycle owners and prone to all kinds of rationalizations to buy what makes us happy. Buy what makes you happy.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
17,037 Posts
Much like the use of sonar on submarines, the use of radar detectors to the best of their capacity requires focus and finesse.

When LEO shines a laser or pulls the trigger for instant on Ka the vehicle aimed at is toast. Too late.

The key is to pick-up on the use of laser or Ka on a vehicle ahead of you. To properly interpret the little beeps that occur, separating the wheat from chaff. In the 40 years I've been using radar detectors my interpretation and reaction times are pretty good.

Maybe this is why my preference is for the Redline. The twin horn design makes for long distance pick-up of signals. The lack of GPS is not the issue for me as my motorcycle use is rural and out of town. For my car the Max is tops.

Hearing the little sounds allows me to use the same mental processing I do in every vehicle. That is why I use the speaker out jack and ear monitors is important for my use.

For high speed long distance travel I'm able to get a read on speed enforcement several vehicles ahead of me. For twisty mountain rural riding it is more a matter of eyesight with moving LEOs and easy pick-up of stationary LEOs as we approach towns.

As Pitts says, we all make choices in a country with so many things to choose from. What effort I'm willing to go through to get a leg up on speed enforcement is probably more than most are willing to engage in.

http://radartest.com/best-radar-detector.asp
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
17,037 Posts
The other benefit of Escort is their Escort Live. Not so much for LEO warnings but for the cellular software updates. I keep my detectors updated and use the iPhone app to configure the detectors.

Saw the Redline XR configuration while researching for this thread. Will implement the suggested settings today.

Escort Redline XR review
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
17,037 Posts
As you can see here, all the good detectors notice radar on either side of two miles out.

Radar Detector Testing 2015 - Radar Roy

My ears, and reactions, are tuned to the specific sounds Escort has for the different radar bands. This means I pretty well have to use an Escort product to operate at the same level of proficiency as when driving my car. I don't need to look away from the road to know exactly what's going on. My reactions are spinal, at this point.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,508 Posts
I had the TPX 1.0. Had a lot of "false hits". It was OK though.

Upgraded to the TPX 2.0 - vast improvement. I have ridden across the U.S. four times with the 2.0, and haven't gotten any "performance awards". This timeframe also includes a BBG where my average moving speed over less than 24 hours (Utah/Nevada wide open spaces) was 85 MPH. Had ample warning when needed to slow.

I run mine on Highway, No X, No K setting. The vast majority of LEOs in CA use Ka band.

When traversing the U.S., and going through small town USA, I will turn K back on, because some of the smaller LEO forces still use that one.

Side note: some asshat stole my TPX 2.0 off the bike. The nice folks at Adaptive sold me just the unit (minus mounting/wiring hardware) at a discount; I was prepared to buy the whole thing again.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
922 Posts
I have always used Valentine, Escort and Bel products. What appears to be hard data suggest they provide the best detection range. I used these products in cages and on bikes. After several years of various waterproofing efforts for the car based detectors ranging from taping the seams to help keep water out, using plastic bags, using ugly big plastic enclosures, etc. I got fed up with them. I think when the second expensive car unit died I gave up on them and took the plunge for the TPX.

My first TPX was the 1.0. We took a three day trip where we rode for several hundred miles each day. A high end Escort or Valentine unit was on my bike, the TPX on my brothers. We had bike to bike communication and would let eachother know when our detectors alerted. Despite what the data may suggest, our real world test indicated the performance was virtually identical. Sometimes the TPX was more responsive, sometimes the high end car unit was more responsive but for the vast majority of alerts they were almost identical in alert response.

We did this on a few more rides in the first season I had the TPX 1.0 and always had the same results. I have since upgraded to 2.0 but really had no complaints with the performance of 1.0.

The superior mounting, easier to read display, motorcycle friendly buttons, WATERPROOF, and secure mounting make these units a big winner for me.

I still use Escort and Bel products in my cages. I have a Bel STi Magnum, Escort 9500ix and Escort Max 360 that I rotate through. All have their strengths and weaknesses and all have their place. For me their place is in them is in something with a roof. For the open air I only go with TPX and have since around 2010/2011. I do believe there is solid evidence their detection range is equal of the high end car units. The real world evidence showed that advantage was not there and the motorcycle specific design of the TPX is really great.

Good thing we have options. Some folks will want/need ultimate detection. Others may like convenience. My fear with TPX was the compromise in performance would negate the benefit of having a radar detector. I was pleasantly surprised it seemed to work just fine. I expected it would not work well enough and am thankful it works quite well.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
3,075 Posts
I think a lot of the specsmanship in RD product companies are mostly distinctions without real meaning. They're hoping you buy in to the "more is better" marketing when good enough is good enough. Laser detection is an example of that. It's completely useless on any vehicle unless you've got it installed exactly where the LEO hits you with the laser spot. There's no scatter to pick up otherwise. And when you're hit, you're done with no time to react. The only reason they put anything like that in the RD units is specsmanship.

But hey, we're motorcycle owners and prone to all kinds of rationalizations to buy what makes us happy. Buy what makes you happy.
I don't know much about radar and laser detection but your post could simplify things for me if I understand it correctly. Are you saying that laser jammers are not worth the investment and not a reliable devise? Confirmation of this would be helpful.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,508 Posts
1 - 20 of 40 Posts
Top